Anorexia Nervosa.

Anorexia nervosa.

Filed under: Eating Disorders

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 8;
Föcker M, Knoll S, Hebebrand J

We first discuss current diagnostic issues concerning the classification of anorexia nervosa (AN) by reference to the proposed criteria of the fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). We strongly welcome the changes in the latest revision of DSM-5 (update April 2012), which in our opinion partially solve the previously delineated classification problems. Nevertheless, we still miss a standard or reference(s) for the weight criterion including the delineation between a healthy and unhealthy underweight, a better operationalization of observable behaviors including symptoms of disordered eating, readily accessible cognitions and a better allowance for cross-cultural aspects in the proposed DSM-5 classification of AN. In the second part, we review the treatment recommendations of the NICE guidelines for AN, which overall are characterized by a lack of evidence. Nevertheless, NICE recommended an outpatient treatment setting based on one randomized controlled trial with many methodological limitations. A review of the current literature shows that (a) the optimal treatment setting (inpatient vs. outpatient treatment) still is a subject of debate, and (b) the evaluation of treatment costs in AN plays an important role within this discussion. In contrast to the German Guidelines for the Treatment of Eating Disorders, NICE does not offer any specific criteria for the clinician with regard to determining the adequate treatment setting.
HubMed – eating disorders

Psychiatric disorders in women with fertility problems: results from a large Danish register-based cohort study.

Filed under: Eating Disorders

Hum Reprod. 2012 Dec 6;
Baldur-Felskov B, Kjaer SK, Albieri V, Steding-Jessen M, Kjaer T, Johansen C, Dalton SO, Jensen A

STUDY QUESTION: Do women who don’t succeed in giving birth after an infertility evaluation have a higher risk of psychiatric disorders compared with women who do? SUMMARY ANSWER: The results indicated that being unsuccessful in giving birth after an infertility evaluation could be an important risk factor for psychiatric disorders. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have investigated the association between fertility treatment and psychological distress, but the results from these studies show substantial variation and lack of homogeneity that may be due to methodological limitations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: A retrospective cohort study was designed using data from a cohort of 98 320 Danish women evaluated for fertility problems during 1973-2008 and linked to several Danish population-based registries. All women were followed from the date of first infertility evaluation until date of hospitalization for the psychiatric disorder in question, date of emigration, date of death or 31 December 2008, whichever occurred first. Owing to the precise linkage between the infertility cohort and the Danish population-based registries, using the unique Danish personal identification number, virtually no women were lost to follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Information on reproductive status for all women in the infertility cohort was obtained by linkage to the Danish Medical Birth Registry. A total of 53 547 (54.5%) women gave birth after the initial infertility evaluation, whereas 44 773 (45.5%) women did not gave birth after the evaluation. To determine psychiatric disorders diagnosed in the women after enrolment in the infertility cohort, the cohort was linked to the Danish Psychiatric Central Registry. A total of 4633 women were hospitalized for a psychiatric disorder. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between parity status after the initial infertility evaluation and risk of hospitalization for various groups of psychiatric disorders, including ‘all mental disorders’ and six main discharge subgroups labelled: ‘alcohol and intoxicant abuse’, ‘schizophrenia and psychoses’, ‘affective disorders’, ‘anxiety, adjustment and obsessive compulsive disorders’, ‘eating disorder’ and ‘other mental disorders’. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The incidence rate for all mental disorders was 393 cases per 100 000 person-years among women who did not succeed in giving birth after the infertility evaluation but only 353 cases per 100 000 person-years among women who succeeded in giving birth after the infertility evaluation. Women not giving birth after the infertility evaluation had an increased risk of hospitalization for all mental disorders (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11; 1.25), alcohol and intoxicant abuse (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.69; 2.41), schizophrenia and psychoses (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17; 1.82) and other mental disorders (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27; 1.58) compared with women who gave birth after the infertility evaluation. In contrast, the risk of affective disorders (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81; 0.99) was decreased among women not giving birth after the infertility evaluation. Finally, the risk of anxiety, adjustment and obsessive compulsive disorders (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97; 1.17) as well as of eating disorders (HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.88; 2.22) was not significantly affected by parity status after the infertility evaluation. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: As only psychiatric conditions warranting hospitalization could be included in the present study, the true incidence of all psychiatric disorders among women with fertility problems is likely to be somewhat underestimated. Furthermore, since detailed information on fertility treatment was not available for all cohort members the association between different modalities of assisted reproductive techniques and risk of psychiatric disorders was not assessed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Clinicians and other healthcare personnel involved in diagnosis and treatment of women with fertility problems should be aware of the potential risk modification of psychiatric disorders associated with unsuccessful fertility treatment. Hence, our results may point to new aspects of follow-up of women with fertility problems who are unsuccessful in giving birth in order to prevent or identify and treat these possible psychological side effects. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by the Danish Cancer Society (award number: 96 222 54). All authors report no conflicts of interest.
HubMed – eating disorders

Weight change associated with corticosteroid therapy in adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Filed under: Eating Disorders

Lupus. 2012 Dec 7;
Manaboriboon B, Silverman E, Homsanit M, Chui H, Kaufman M

Physical appearance is very important to adolescents and weight gain secondary to corticosteroid (CS) treatment may have a direct impact on adolescent development. Understanding weight gain in adolescents with SLE who are being treated with CS will help clinicians develop strategies for prevention of nonadherence, obesity and eating disorders in this population.Methods:Patients aged 11-18 years old with newly diagnosed SLE between January,1995 and December, 2006 were identified through the Rheumatology database at the Sickkids hospital, Canada. All charts were reviewed. Patients were categorized based on final BMI status as normal, overweight and obese. Risk factors for being obese were examined by logistic regression model analysis.Results:Of 236 patients, 78% fulfilled the criteria. 85% were female with mean age at onset of diagnosis was 14?±?1.7 years. Mean duration of CS treatment was 50?±?31 months and mean cumulative CS dosage was 34.11?±?32.7?g of prednisone. At baseline, 10% had BMI >25?kg/m(2) while at the end of the study, 20% were overweight and 10.4% were obese. In addition, 61% gained <10?kg while 15% gained ?20?kg. Initial BMI was a significant predictors for final BMI (OR?=?27.59, 95%CI?=?6.04-126.09, p?10?kg. Duration of CS treatment did not correlate with obesity.Conclusion:Although a significant number of patients became overweight or obese after being treated with CS, most gained <10?kg. Obesity secondary to CS treatment in SLE patients was significantly correlated with baseline BMI, gender and cumulative CS dosage. HubMed – eating disorders

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioural therapy v. conventional guided self-help for bulimia nervosa: long-term evaluation of a randomised controlled trial.

Filed under: Eating Disorders

Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 6;
Wagner G, Penelo E, Wanner C, Gwinner P, Trofaier ML, Imgart H, Waldherr K, Wöber-Bingöl C, Karwautz AF

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT)-based guided self-help is recommended as a first step in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. AIMS: To evaluate in a randomised controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT00461071) the long-term effectiveness of internet-based guided self-help (INT-GSH) compared with conventional guided bibliotherapy (BIB-GSH) in females with bulimia nervosa. METHOD: A total of 155 participants were randomly assigned to INT-GSH or BIB-GSH for 7 months. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, month 4, month 7 and month 18. RESULTS: The greatest improvement was reported after 4 months with a continued reduction in eating disorder symptomatology reported at month 7 and 18. After 18 months, 14.6% (n = 7/48) of the participants in the INT-GSH group and 25% (n = 7/28) in the BIB-GSH group were abstinent from binge eating and compensatory measures, 43.8% (n = 21/48) and 39.2% (n = 11/28) respectively were in remission. No differences regarding outcome between the two groups were found. CONCLUSIONS: Internet-based guided self-help for bulimia nervosa was not superior compared with bibliotherapy, the gold standard of self-help. Improvements remain stable in the long term.
HubMed – eating disorders

More Eating Disorders Information…